Black College Students Pledge To Be Greek Homosexuals

By Xavier James

It seems to me a Black person would want to pledge to be African; wouldn’t you think? I’ve always wondered why a person of color would pledge to be Greek and what that really meant. So, I did some digging. I found out that Ancient Greek fraternities were all homosexual organizations with the main focus on sodomizing each other; what….yeah!

I also found out that hazing and degrading initiates was a European tradition; not African.

“It’s about comradeship and a bond between brothers. It’s about mentoring and learning.”

One enthusiastic new recruit argued; yet again another lie. Fact is, to be a mentor in Greek culture meant that you sodomized young boys and in exchange for your victimization they received food, shelter and education. I immediately realized these Negroes in these fraternities knew very little about these Greek freaks they imitated. They had no idea about this ‘thing’ they were so committed to. And the ones who do know use this knowledge to slowly but surely ‘bend’ the new recruits over.

Once again we have slaves emulating their masters, and in the process, committing degrading, and sometimes homosexual acts against each other; all for the sake of a letter.

Why do I have to be Greek to be your brother? Why do I have to pattern and practice Greek homosexual sickness just to gain your respect and loyalty? It’s abundantly clear; self hate and not knowing one’s self can follow you from grade school, to high school and through college. I bet Europeans just laugh their asses off when they see a bunch of ‘colored’ People, who don’t know their own history, running around imitating the worst parts of theirs. Now, every time I see these fraternities and sororities marching, stepping and doing secret hand shakes, I know the real secrets they’re hiding. And it’s a damn shame!

taken from xavierjamesuncensored.blogspot.com

Patdown or Scan?

"I'm not homophobic. I just don't like being touched by men."

That's what a friend of mine said about the airport patdown. I told him 'homophobic' was a political term and not an actual condition.

"Whatever," he said. "I still don't want some guy feeling me up at the airport."

And I agreed. I think travelers should be given a choice between a man or woman patting them down. I sure as hell don't want some guy checking my balls at the airport. I'd rather use the Advanced Imaging Technology machine compared to that type of intrusion.

"What about radiation?" he asked.

"I don't think it's no more then what you get when you nuke your Oodles of Noodles in the microwave," I shrugged. "And hey, if you don't like the patdown go greyhound."

That's kind of catchy, huh!

Why are 'Colored' folks mad about Rush Limbaugh's comments?

"Clyburn's worried about not having the perk of a big office, driver and so forth. The way this can all be worked out, Clyburn's new position: Driving Miss Nancy."

Notorious Racist Rush Limbaugh was referencing the 1989 Movie 'Driving Miss Daisy.' Don't act so outraged; he was just referencing what he's seen. The images of Morgan Freeman kissing that old White woman's butt throughout the movie stayed in Limbaugh's mind. Just like Kimberly Elise in 'Diary of a Mad Black Woman' may remind him of Michelle Obama.

Rep. James Clyburn probably reminds him of another Tyler Perry parody that I won't mention. Y’all 'Negroes' and 'Colored' people give white folks these negative images and reinforced stereotypes in movies like 'For Colored Girls' but get ‘mad’ when they fire them back at you. You finally have the power to show the world something different but you don't. You 'colored' girls and boys need to just keep watching Tyler Perry movies and shut the f**k up!

'For Colored Girls' Should Be Banned!

BY XAVIER JAMES


Just when you thought Tyler Perry couldn't possibly out due himself-he did. 'For Colored Girls' is amazing; amazingly ridiculous. The title alone (‘For Colored Girls') makes Black women think the movie is something inspiring and uplifting. But nothing could be further from the truth. Here are a few of the comments I've heard from people so far:


"It’s overdone."                 "The most dread filled movie I've ever seen."             "Makes me feel like there's no hope."       And my favorite;     "it should be banned."

 I agree with them all. Tyler Perry is good at exploiting the fact that Black folks want to see black movies because we want to see ourselves on the big screen. The problem is 'For Colored Girls' isn't drama it's a horror movie containing about ten sub-plots in a script full of underdeveloped characters. In one scene a Black man murders his children. Something I've never heard of in my life. In another scene Janet Jackson's character receives the most tragic news of her life but goes out partying ten minutes later. Thandie Newton’s character appears to be a whore for no reason at all.

None of the issues the characters faced were ever resolved; unless you consider the group hug at the end of the movie- therapy. It kind of reminded me of Jerry Springer exploiting and laughing at his guests the entire show, then at the end, his final thought makes it all better. We're all use to Tyler Perry’s constant demonization of Black men in his movies but this unprovoked attack on his core fan base is perplexing. The overt message throughout the movie is that Black women are stuck on stupid, desperate and don't need to be with Black men. And of course the subliminal message; get a “White man because Black men ain't sh*&!”

A lot of Black folks hated B.E.T. because of the images they transmitted to our children and around the world. The damage they did to Black minds has lasted at least two generations. In a parade of buffoonish mockery and shameless stereotypes wrapped in melodrama, Tyler Perry has been doing the exact same thing for years now. These types of images make people of other races hate you before they even meet you. It also poisons the way we interact with each other.

The trend in Hollywood for the past 10 years shows us how studios “green light” and heavily promote movies that portray Black folks as evil or stupid. Be it 'Diary of a Mad Black Woman', 'Precious', 'Nsecure', 'For Colored Girls', or ‘Waiting to Exhale’ they've gone out of their way to demonize the image of the Black male and make Black women look like fools or whores. Although 'For Colored Girls' is based on someone else’s writing (which Tyler Perry took completely out of context. Watch the original play for yourself) he could have simply said no to the project. I don't care how many people he exploits (oops, I meant employs) wrong is wrong.

You need to understand this; seeing images of strong, positive, intelligent, honest, righteous Black folks reinforce pride, commitment and a desire to strive for excellence. Our minds set a psychological bar of which to aspire. The opposite instills self hate and hopelessness. Do you remember the 'White doll' experiment? The Black children kept choosing the White doll over the Black Doll because they had been bombarded from birth with images of self hate.

Let's get analytical for a second. A man who loves to dress like a woman and beat up on men in most of his movies, Tyler Perry himself must be consumed with an enormous amount of self hatred to constantly send these false, despicable, one sided images of Black Folks around the world. Someone asked me what other movie I would compare 'For Colored Girls' to? I thought for a second, and then I told them 'Birth of a Nation'. Yeah, because the psychological effect of that one movie did irreparable damage to Black folks in America and has lasted in the minds of White folks to this day. And just like 'Birth of a Nation' the images in this movie will live among us for many years to come. The vast majority of this movie is not representative of Black men or Black women. They are untrue and quite frankly 'Colored People' should feel down right insulted! From xavierjamesuncensored.blogspot.com

Recent Exploision of White Women Heroes Don't Jib with History

By Xavier James





Over the past decade there's been a barrage of movies and television series portraying White women as relentless, unstoppable heroines standing toe to toe with men and beating them down. Is this a strategy to shape and change the otherwise submissive image and perception of White women around the world? Fact is, there were not, and currently are not White women heroes in history. Xena: Warrior Princess never existed nor does Angelina Jolie's 2010 action hero's 'Salt'. There's no credible historical documentation anywhere on earth where White women engaged in hand to hand combat with men and defeated them, period; didn't happen! Yet our lives are saturated with this indoctrination.



Now here's the exception to the rule; a revolutionary soldier named Deborah Sampson. Miss Sampson's manly features allowed her to dress like a man, hide her breasts and join the military. She fought bravely in battle and was wounded; kudos. However, that is not hand to hand combat and if they knew Deborah Sampson was a woman they probably would not have shot at her. They would have however, proceeded to raping her as they have always done.

Now, I have nothing against White women, but this lie has become overwhelming. And the truth should be told. So let me dispel those and  other myths;

Gordafarid was Iranian and simple poetic folklore.
Amazon Women of Greece-never existed.
Warrior Queen Vishpala of the Iron Leg was Indian (Mid East) and also a myth
The Shield Maidens- more fiction and folk-lure
Valkyries Of Norse- mythology

They never existed. Now, someone’s going to yell out; “what about Joan of Ark?” What about her? Joan of Ark was a religious nut who swore she heard voices. These days she’d be institutionalized. Joan of Ark never engaged in hand to hand combat. “She preferred to carry her banner into battle rather then a weapon.” She didn’t want to harm anyone. She even had her own bodyguards. However, submissive White women have always been the norm.



During World War 2 the Jewish, French and Greek women couldn’t wait to drop their panties for the Third Reich; go look it up! Yet on Tell-lie-vision they’re kicking ass and taking names. There are instances where entire villages gave themselves to the Germans while their men were at war. There are countless examples of the 'White woman hero' lie and manipulation floating throughout history. In contrast; Black women heroes or heroines date back to the beginning of time. Yet they are rarely talked about and definitely not depicted in Hollywood.




*Queen Candace in the 4th century BCE kept Alexander the Greek (he wasn’t great) off her land; Ethiopia. She personally went with her army to engage him in battle.
*North African Amazon Women Warriors
Aka the Amazons of Dahomey
*Warrior Queen Amina of Zau Zau
*Nupe Women warriors
*Nyabinghi
*Bazao-Turunku
*In 1848 African women fought off a group of White slave hunters
outside of Ohio.
*The Aba Women’s Rebellion of 1929
*Yaa Asantewaa fought the British in her Ghana homeland
*Liberation women fighters under Charles Taylor in the 1990’s



And the greatest of all women warriors- Queen Nzinga; the Hannibal of her day. She fought the Portuguese toe to toe for forty years until her death. Black women from slavery to segregation stood toe to toe with White men exchanging punches and fighting off dogs. In school they told us Amelia Earhart was a hero because she flew over the Atlantic Ocean and disappeared. Meanwhile, Harriet Tubman, while being the most hunted person on earth at the time, single handedly went into enemy territory to save countless lives and all they ever called her was a runaway slave.



Not so long ago they tried to convince us Jessica Lynch was a hero. In actuality she got shot and rescued by the enemy the same day; never firing her weapon. Battered woman’s shelters are full of White women that ran when their husbands raised their fists; meanwhile jails are full of Black women that didn’t. So the next time you turn on your television and they’re parading some White woman around as some kind of hero who saves the world, take it with a grain of salt- because now you know the truth!

It Was homosexuals who initiated "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" in the first place

By Xavier James

Wait a minute, I’m confused. No, homosexuals are confused. Then again, America is confused. Homosexuals are back again demanding special privileges that are denied other citizens. When the military had a policy of discrimination based on sexual orientation they lobbied and hounded the Clinton administration to death to change the policy. Rallies, pickets and lawsuits prevailed. Bill Clinton signed “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” into law and it was truly a good compromise. Translation:
I don’t ask you what you’re doing in the privacy of your own bedroom and you don’t run up to me telling me what you like to do in the privacy of your own bedroom; perfect!

Suddenly this policy is no longer good enough. And I can’t figure out why. But I do know exactly what will take place once homosexuals are allowed to openly serve.

A)Christian and Muslim soldiers who were raised to believe homosexuality is wrong, are automatically going to distance themselves from that person; they're not going to have their back. If a straight soldier hangs out with a homosexual soldier his fellow servicemen will think he's 'gay' too; awkward. Homosexual soldiers will work ten times harder to prove they're as good as everybody else. Straight soldiers will of course work twenty times harder not to let a homosexual outdo them; continuous drama and antipathy.
B)Next comes homosexual sensitivity training; mandatory of course.
C)The fratenization policy goes straight out the window. Homosexuals will challenge that soon after. Soon they'll be openly 'gay' Admirals and Generals running the military. If a homosexual soldier gets caught having  sexual relations with another soldier he' ll say: "you knew I was 'Gay' when you let me join." They're going to flaunt their homosexuality. Then comes; " why do I have to do extra push-ups? You're just picking on me because I'm 'gay."

If someone's 'gay' that's their business. I don't know. I don't need to know. I've been racking my brain trying to figure out why homosexuals want everybody to know what "goes down" in their bedrooms. And I could come up with only one answer: homosexuals want people to know what they do in their bedrooms because they want to include them in their bedroom activities.

I Like Sarah Palin Because....

She brings your enemies to the forefront. They come out of hiding and remove their sheets to attend her speeches and rallies. You get to find out which of your neighbors are supporting her while at the same time understanding why they never speak to you.  I also like Sarah Palin because she personifies the functioning illiteracy of White folks who run this country. Every time she opens her mouth I’m reminded why and how racism still dominates American society.

I laughed when I heard that her daughter Bristol was going to be on Dancing With The Stars. The show loves to promote and exalt the most scandalous, deceitful White folks in America. So now they’ll be another illiterate hillbilly we have to watch White Americans heap unearned and undeserved praise, privilege and celebrity upon. In the words of the still disgruntled Rev. Jeremiah Wright: God Bless America!

Qur'an burning is normal Christian behavior

Why is Qur’an burning such a big surprise?


Christians have been burning books for centuries…among other things- like; buildings, libraries,records,sacrificial animals, people they claim were witches, and yes Black folks. It was Christians who use to lynch and burn Black folks on Sunday after church service. Then they’d cut their penises off and put them in  jars as souvenirs. And this new crop of book burners are their children. Why is anybody surprised or outraged that a bunch of backwoods, inbred, gun totting, Bible reading Christians want to burn the Qur’an? I’m just surprised it took them this long to get around to it.

Parents are allowed to kill their children every hurricane season

“Swimmers advised to stay in shallow waters. Rip currents and undertows can drag swimmers and surfers away from boats and beaches.”

Why hasn’t anybody talked about this but me? Why hasn’t this been noticed by anybody other then me? Every hurricane season we hear about the senseless drowning deaths of quite a few children; from coast to coast wherever a hurricane or tropical storm is about to hit land. And all the deaths stem from parents who take their children out into rough, stormy waters to supposedly have fun. What kind of parent takes a child into rough, dangerous, deadly waters, without as much as a life jacket so that they can surf together? Is watching your child drown supposed to be fun?

If a ten year old child is truant from school they charge the parent. If a twelve year old boy takes a car and causes an accident the parents are liable. If a fifth teen year old girl is found to be malnourished the parents are arrested. When a child goes missing who are the primary suspects? That’s right, the parents; except when the child goes missing around water. If a lifeguard warns an adult not to go into dangerous waters and they do it anyway, that’s their right as an adult. But who looks out for the child whose parent takes them straight into riptides?

I’ve seen fishing accidents where the boat turns over and the child isn’t even wearing a life preserver. I believe some of these drowning incidents are planned. Google it for yourself; they’re getting away with murder or at the very least negligent homicide. I have yet to see one parent bought up on charges or even investigated. People that stupid should be in jail. Its obvious laws that protect children from unfit parents stop at the shore line.

New T.V. Show “Bait Car” Should be Called “Race Car”

By Xavier James


I was watching the new series ‘Bait Car’ on truTV and it actually made my stomach hurt. This show about cops cracking down on car theft proved to be nothing short of entrapment! Here’s how it worked: The auto theft squad put a flashy car equipped with multiple, hidden cameras in a highly populated area and waited for car thieves to steal it. Then after the thieves get a few blocks away, a kill switch is hit, the engine shuts off, and the perpetrators are locked inside until the cops arrest them; clever huh?


Except there’s a major problem; they didn’t catch any real car thieves- just a bunch of teenagers and crack heads. Sure the people who went for the set up took the car, but stealing a car wasn’t even on their brains until the police put it there. Here’s what I mean; These fat, lazy, pathetic donut eaters, put a shinny, red, Cadillac Escalade in the most economically depraved part of town, left the keys inside, the engine running, and the doors wide open. They even put a play station 3 on the back seat to sweeten the deal. I don’t think I could’ve walked pass that car without diving in. Was it any surprise everyone they arrested was either Black or Latino. I mean, these people looked straight up hungry. No car ever made it to a chop shop because they weren’t real car thieves. And if you noticed, they didn’t put the ‘bait car’ out in the suburbs because they wanted to keep distorting the image of Blacks and Latinos.


These flatfoots, who will undoubtedly multiply their ‘dubious’ arrest records, couldn’t catch any real car thieves so they had to manufacture their own. Reality T.V. has reached an all time low; again! Locks were made to keep honest men honest. Thieves don’t give a dam about a lock. But leaving a flashy car running with the doors open around a bunch of poor people is “spineless" police work and in my view; entrapment. Is the economy that bad for police officers? Have the cops gotten that hard up for money that they have to stoop this low? It’s yet another case of a police department selling out its community for corporate interests. There should be a disclaimer when this show comes on: FOR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES ONLY! Because these cops couldn’t possibly take themselves seriously. Taken From xavierjamesuncensored.blogspot.com

The Back to School Scam

This year my 8th grade son's school materials list cost almost as much as my college daughter's school books. How is that possible? It looked more like a Walmart order form then back to school supplies. And this is public school we're talking about here. Aside from dozens of notebooks and pencils there were a large demand for wet wipes, anti-bacterial cleaners and containers. Then the list told parents not to put their names on any of the stuff they send their kids to school with. Why? So that the teachers can claim and distribute the items among eachother. I know some teachers actually divide items with the children who don't have their supplies; that's fine but simply tell us that instead of playing on our intelligence. There are countless organizations that donate supplies to schools in every city. What do they do with those?


Back to school ads already put enough pressure on parents to spend hundreds of dollars on the latest over priced jeans, shirts and sneakers to make the children feel important or not to get laughed at for not wearing the latest fads. This year I guarantee there's also going to be an increase in field trips and fund raisers for parents to come out of their pockets on. Still, the drop out rates keep rising, SOL's are lagging, the cafeteria food still sucks and  our children are getting dumber; but teacher's salories keep rising. Go figure. Now do you understand why teachers and educators don't like being evaluated? look up the L.A. Times 'value analysis' report and you'll see i'm right. Principals & teachers we're onto your scam. No matter how much they harrass me, call or send letters home, this year I'm going to buy what my son needs instead of what they want him to have.

 E-mail xavierjames2010@yahoo.com

The Future of the Public School System

By Xavier James



On Valentines Day 2010 the children in the all boy’s class at “Capt. Columbus” elementary school in Hampton, Virginia were chewing on their Valentine’s Day candy. Upon seeing this-the teacher, “Mr. Watson” in a seething homosexual slur, demanded that they “suck” their candy; “you can’t chew in my class you have to suck. Don’t chew, suck,” he demanded. This homosexual teacher, in a public school, in charge of instructing, molding and teaching these boys how to be men, was doing the exact opposite. One can only imagine why he’d be concerned about how little boys ate their candy unless it somehow fascinated him.


Or maybe watching first grade boys suck on lollipops somehow turned him on; you decide. But if ‘all men teach as they do’ then his annoying gay slur, female walk and mannerisms are being recorded and processed as acceptable, respectable and normal male behavior to this group of first grade boys. What’s also disturbing is that this all boy’s class exchanged Valentines Day cards intended for the opposite sex. Remember, there are no girls in their class. God knows if they go on a field trip they’d be paired off and taught to hold hands with each other. The overt and subliminal homosexual programming here is obvious.


This same school also includes an all girl’s class with no boys. Get the picture. A month later “Mr. Watson” told his boys to “say that you’re ‘gay’ whenever you’re happy,” because ‘gay’ means that you’re happy. Say you’re gay.” Gay hasn’t meant happy in over fifty years.

This ‘experiment’ was designed to prove that in a classroom setting girls presented a distraction for boys and vice versa. The architects of this plan insist that separating the sexes gave each group better grades. That’s debatable. Because the problem was never the children’s capacity to learn, it’s always been the teacher’s inability to teach. The sad but true fact is that most teachers gave up teaching years ago.


They only show up at school everyday just to get a paycheck. And they have no problem blaming our children for not learning what they’ve been unsuccessful at teaching. If the goal of school is to prepare children for life how does separating them along the gender line help? In every aspect of life, girls and boys, men and women are going to interact and compete on every level. Real life is full of distractions.



The military teaches aggression. Christian schools teach Christianity. And homosexual teachers teach homosexuality; by word or deed. It’s inescapable. Would you have an anti-war activist teach at a military academy? Would you let an anti-abortionist teach a class on stem cell research? No, and why not, because every truth would be blurred and every fact skewed and every viewpoint catered to fit their philosophy and agenda. Would you let a homosexual priest teach alter boys? Ooops.


Now that poses another question; If Christian priests can’t keep their hands off little boys how can you expect a homosexual male who believes he should’ve been born a women, to keep his views or his hands to himself? Just like within the Catholic Church pedophiles protect other pedophiles, let’s watch and see who comes to the defense of these homosexual teachers. It was no accident a homosexual male was placed in charge of these boys. The principal or school board is directly responsible and they knew it would be years before any parent knows the damage that’s been done to their child.


What gave them the right to put your son or daughter in harms way? This is yet another homosexual strategy to introduce gullible children to same sex environments at an early and impressionable age. And weather you approve, disapprove, agree, disagree, like it or not, you and your children are part of this far reaching plan. Welcome to the homosexual conspiracy!
 From xavierjamesuncensored.blogspot.com

Turning A Blind Eye

                                                                      

By Xavier James


Why are people so unable or unwilling to distinguish between righteousness and those evil men who use religion to disguise their real aims? The unthinking Muslim or Christian would likely believe that his/her religion is being attacked rather then those conquerors and enslavers and pedophiles and con men and opportunists who disgraced it in covering their desire for wealth and world domination.


- Chancellor Williams, historian [Italics mine]

I’ve got a few questions for you to think about. If you knew the little boy who lived next door to you was being molested, what would you do? Would you call the police? Would you at least alert Child Protective Services? Or would you think it was none of your business and do absolutely nothing? What if it were your child? The one thing you wouldn’t do is protect the child molester, would you? These are the questions Pope Benedict XVI should have been asking himself. And now these are the questions you have to ask yourself about Pope Benedict XVI and the entire Catholic hierarchy. When I heard that a priest had molested over 200 little deaf boys I shook my head. When the New York Times reported that Pope Benedict XVI himself covered up the crimes I cringed. You see, it’s a known fact that pedophiles protect other pedophiles. In 1962 the Catholic Church galvanized the already centuries old practice of baring priests from turning other priests over to the authorities. Not only do they feel that they are above the law but that the bodies of the children left in their care aren’t worth protecting.

Can you imagine being an 8 year old deaf boy, who’s already being ignored and shunned by the rest of the world, trying to explain to an adult that your mentor and priest keeps pulling down your pants? Does the child reconcile this betrayal in his young mind by thinking he’s helping God? Does the priest tell the boy that he’s doing God’s work? Who knows? But one thing is for certain; no one was there who gave a dam- then or now. The crime was repulsive. The cover up was horrible. But do you still believe that these disgusting human beings ever represented God? In March of 2010, the Pope called the allegations “petty gossip.” But if you were to interview the 200 boys that father Lawrence Murphy molested, I bet you’d find that some have committed suicide, some are male prostitutes, and some think that they themselves are homosexual. I guarantee that most of them have struggled in relationships their entire lives; angry, full of distrust, in and out of jail. And quite a few I’m sure went on to molest hundreds of boys themselves. Petty gossip, I think not. I’ve seen numerous cases were a mother was charged for being an accessory to the abuses her husband committed against their children, while she watched and did nothing.

So how are Popes, cardinals, priests, bishops or evangelists above the law when it comes to raping other people’s children? These crimes against humanity have been going on within the Catholic Church since its conception. The hierarchy of this non-profit money machine has no ethics, morality, conscience or obligation except aiding and abetting fellow child molesters. But here’s a frequently overlooked fact; homosexual priests can’t prey on children if the children’s parents don’t let them. What does that mean? Any Catholic who allowed their son to be an alter boy knew the risks but ignored them. They put religion over the safety of their own children. Shame on them! Shame on them all!

E-mail: xavierjames2010@yahoo.com

A Mosque at ground zero?

                                               A Mosque at ground zero?



To me it’s political operatives creating more wedge issues. As long as they cleared zoning there shouldn’t be a problem. Christians have been trotting around the globe dropping bombs, installing puppet governments and building churches for years. Building a Mosque anywhere near ground zero isn’t wrong or illegal; it’s just in bad taste. It keeps drama stirred up. How do they expect to worship peacefully with so much conflict on the horizon? It defeats the purpose. I personally don’t want to see a Mosque, Church, Cathedral or Synagogue being built there. Religious politics is what’s got everybody at each others throats right now.

GOODBYE DR. LAURA

You mean to tell me there's a word White folks can't use under any circumstances? What word is that; because it certainly isn't Nigger. White folks use the word Nigger all the time; they just don't use it around Black folks. Dr. Laura Schlessinger used the word Nigger 11 times during an argument with a Black women because that's what was in her heart. She was bold, angry and for a time, unapologetic. She wanted her White listeners to hear her and become bold enough to sing along. Everytime a high profile White person comes out of their mouth wrong, Black folks should hold them accountable. No excuses! I bet she wouldn't have been calling Jews anything other then Sir and Ma'am.

"Black guys use it all the time," she said. "Turn on HBO, listen to a Black comic and all you hear is Nigger."
I guess her mama never told her not to do everything she sees on television. I hear women call each other 'Bitches' all the time, that doesn't mean I should do it. Besides, quite a few Black folks don't want comedians to use the 'N' word anymore either. White folks invented the word NIGGER as a derogatory, hate filled, insult meant to psychologically do damage. Dr. "Quack" knew that but her arrogance was too blinding. And she'd been dying to say it on the air anyway. She saw her chance and took it.  Although Dr. Laura was using the 'N' word to make a point to a caller, her rationalization that Black folks use it all the time shows intent. Did Dr. Laura call it quits or was she forced to quit? Who cares, she was obnoxious anyway.

You have to change the 14th amendment....

...if you want to preserve White Supremacy in Amerikkka-you do! Most racists are not very smart, but the majority do think in the long term. They want their children and grand children to remain in charge after they die, and you can't do that unless you stop the birth rates of Blacks and Latinos. Statistics indicate that by the year 2050 the demographic make-up in America will go from White majority to White minority ( just like it did in the penal system) but changing the 14th amendment will only prolong the inevitable. Mexicans are pouring over the border like oil gushing from the gulf. But it was alright when White folks were exploiting them for cheap, back-breaking labor. Now that they've used them up and the economy is wrecked they want them(Mexicans) to just go away. Well they ain't and I don't blame them. One could argue they're just coming back home. Did you forget Texas,Arizona, Nevada,New Mexico, etc., were all theirs to start with?

But here's the big secret they're hiding and I'll tie it all in for you; so pay attention. The housing crisis was partially designed to take as much property, money and wealth out of the hands of minorities and put it back into the hands of the so-called elite. Once again they had to make sure the majority of this country's wealth stayed in the hands of their children and grandchildren after their gone. However, with an explosion in Black and Latino populations the voting demographic will drastically change. Blacks and Latinos will undoubtedly start voting Whites out of office in exchange for someone who looks like them. Elected officials make the laws that govern the financial institutions. You can have all the money in the world but you also have to control the flow and distribution of that money. By the year 3010 the House and Senate will look like the L.A. Lakers basketball team. Hense the so-called 'anchor' baby dilema and any baby born on  American soil debate of the 14th amendment. Got it?

I'm sure George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson are turning over in their graves to see the descendants of their old slaves running aroung telling White folks what to do. Well, if white folks had killed off the Mexicans centuries ago like they did the so called "Indians" they wouldn't be in this mess. taken from xavierjamesuncensored.blogspot.com

OMAR THORNTON'S RAMPAGE DEFINED

By Xavier James


Connecticut shooter shot up a beer distributorship filled with racist (white supremacists) who treated him like sh!t)




OMAR THORNTON (34) was a victim/casualty of racism(white supremacy). And I say that knowing full well a lot of you will disagree. The people who were oppressing him have already denied the allegations. When I first heard that a disgruntled, newly fired employee had shot up the warehouse where he worked, I just knew it was a White man. It's a regular occurrence when White Americans are faced with the prospect of poverty. When I found out it was actually a Black man, I was surprised but I honestly knew why. I'm a little older then OMAR but I can tell you; racism effects each generation differently. Our parents basically told us to ignore the racism, turn the other cheek, and pray for the racists.








But in this new age alot of these "young cats" ain't going for it. However, they fail to see the racism until it overwhelms them and they lash out. Add in a greater accessibility to guns and there's a problem.OMAR THORNTON tried to fit in with his WHITE co-workers as he endured years of psychological abuse at work and in society at large. He even went out and got a WHITE girlfriend, but that didn't help. What's interesting however, and what none of the WHITE or even BLACK media has the foresight or courage to talk about is this new pattern in BLACK pathology that's arising. THORNTON took his hurt, anguish, and feelings of helplessness out on the people he realized hated and oppressed him; unlike most BLACKS who've been taught to take their frustrations out on other BLACK people. Hence the pattern; a mass epiphany or awakening is emerging.



What will happen when all BLACKS collectively realize they've been tricked into killing each other instead of the people who've relentlessly tried to destroy their lives? Remember Colin Ferguson on the Long Island Transit? How about Brian Nichols, dubbed the Atlanta courthouse killer? One said he did it for his people and the other alluded to racists keeping him down as well. How about NAT TURNER? At any rate, I'll leave you with OMAR THORNTON'S last words " TELL MY PEOPLE I DID IT FOR THEM!" What people do you think he was talking about?



His beautiful girlfriend talked about
 how they treated him like sh!t


Before he died, Thornton called his mother after the shooting spree and talked to her for about ten minutes, telling her, "I killed the racists that were bothering me." FOUR YEARS LATER WHAT'S CHANGED FOR THE BLACK MAN? MORE SHOOTINGS OF HIS ENEMIES INSTEAD OF EACH OTHER-THAT'S WHAT!

PROPOSITION 8

GENDER SPECIFIC ROLES CAN NEVER CHANGE BECAUSE THEY WERE DESIGNED BY NATURE AS SUCH TO COMPLIMENT AND BALANCE EACH OTHER. IT IS A NATURAL BIOLOGICAL CONDITION. HOMOSEXUALITY IS A SOCIO-POLITICAL CONDITION THAT AS WE'VE SEEN REQURES A POLITICAL SOLUTION. POWER SPECIFIC ROLES CHANGED BECAUSE EUROPEAN MALES DOMINANCE GAVE IN TO THE INTELLECTUAL STRENGTH OF THE FEMALE.

ANY COMPARISON OF HOMOSEXUALITY TO CIVIL OR HUMAN RIGHTS IS AN OLD POLITICAL TACTIC. HOMOSEXUALS HAVE ALWAYS BEEN FREE AND HELD MONEY, POWER AND PRIViLEDGE. FROM GREECE TO ROME TO SWEDEN TO AMSTERDAM TO SAN FRANCISCO THERES UNINTERRUPTED CONTINUITY. A QUICK GLANCE AT HISTORY WILL SHOW HOMOSEXUAL CURIOSITY, INCEST, PEDOPHILIA,LEGALITY,STAGNATION AND EVENTUALLY THE DECLINE OF GREAT CIVILIZATIONS BECAUSE OF HOMOSEXUALITY.

HISTORY ALSO SHOWS HOW MAN HAS TRIED TO PLAY GOD AND CHANGE THE NATURAL LAWS OF NATURE; CLONING, CHILD BIRTH OUTSIDE THE WOMB,WOMEN HAVING EIGHT TO TEN BABIES, GENDER REDESIGNATION, A.I.D.S. AND OTHER LAB DISEASES ARE THE RESULT. HAS THE EMBRACE OF HOMOSEXUALITY EVER HELPED HUMANITY? IF SO WHEN AND WHERE?

BACK BEFORE THE EUROPEAN COULD REASON HE WOULD HAVE SEX WITH HIS MOTHER AND MARRY HIS SISTER. NATURE SAID NO AND HANDED DOWN BIRTH DEFECTS AND DISEASES AS A RESULT OF INCEST. HE WOULD HAVE SEX WITH ANIMALS UNTIL LAWS WERE MADE TO STOP HIM.  HOW DID PEOPLE COME TO CONVINCE THEMSELVES THAT SOMETHING UN-NATURAL WAS NATURAL? TAKE A QUICK LOOK AT ANCIENT GREECE AND ROME; IT'S MASS SUICIDE! I SAW ALL THE APPLAUSE AFTER THE DECISION CAME DOWN. AND I WONDER; HOW DID WE STRAY SO FAR FROM SANITY THAT WE COULD CLAP AND CHEER AT OUR VERY OWN DEMISE?