New Big Momma's House Goes Bust!

By Xavier James

Martin Lawrence, who gave us one of the funniest, most creative sitcoms of all time, is strictly in it for the money now; and it shows. He knew the script was horrible when he read it but the zeros at the end of his check made him put the dress back on anyway. After seeing this movie, I can’t help but wonder if the cast threw up at anytime during rehearsals? I sure as hell wanted to. I like Martin Lawrence but this movie just plain sucked. The thin plot and slap stick comedy had me wishing a commercial would come on. But it didn’t. Instead, we’re forced to sit through 107 minutes of stereotypes and fat jokes; two fat guys playing Twister, a Latino woman(the school principal) that speaks broken English, Asians that can’t drive, the anorexic white girl and big, dumb jocks. When I woke up I looked to see if Tyler Perry’s name was in the credits. Nia Long, who played the love interest in the first two films, was very wise to bow out of this one. Although she was offered a lot of money she was somehow able to “just say no.” Besides, she couldn’t be caught dead anywhere near big momma with her new film Mooz-lum creating such a stir. If the title ‘Big Mommas; like father like son’ suggests passing the cross dressing torch to the next generation, they need to be advised; a Black guy in a dress “ain’t” funny no more- It’s just plain sad. From xavierjamesuncensored.blogspot.com

Black History Month has One Foot in the Grave

By Xavier James




A Palestinian woman was visiting the United States one summer and she was talking to a black family. A conversation about the public school system and its teachers arose causing the Palestinian woman to stop and ask in astonishment; “Black families let White teachers educate their children? Palestinians would not allow Jews to teach our children.” It was a fascinating thought coming from someone who “ain’t” even from around here. You’d think that at least during black history month we could respect tradition and teach our own children a thing or two, huh! Black history month just isn’t the same anymore is it? We’re so full of gossip and complicity that we’ve began to seriously lose focus.



The question was posed; do we still need Black history month? Well, is racism (white supremacy) still dominating Black culture? Do we still celebrate Columbus Day? Go tell White Americans to get rid of Columbus Day and well talk. African- Americans will spend a billion dollars on Valentines Day but zero on black history month. Black bookstores are falling like dominos and somebody asks if we still need black history month. Sadly, most Black folks still don’t know their history. If the failed public school system is going to make a Black child pick up a book that teaches him/her something about themselves for 28 days a year, what’s the problem? They’re being taught White history every day of their lives.



Dr. Carter G. Woodson started Black history week (before it became a month) because during his lifetime we were being taught that we had no history. We contributed nothing to society; we practically didn’t exist. He got the ball rolling. I’ve never seen White America collectively do the right thing without being pushed into it. Black history month pushes their curriculum into a corner. But Dr. Woodson was also hoping that by now we’d taken Black history month to the next level by challenging the teacher’s lies. Would you sit quietly inside of a classroom while your teacher tells everybody the world was flat without posing the question as to why the water hasn’t run over the edge yet? No.



If the teacher is feeding you false attribution and folklore disguised as facts, vocalize your disagreement and show proof. All Black students must take the evidence to school and challenge their teachers. That’s the only way these lies are going to stop. That's the only way to make them put the truth inside their books. You don’t have to disrupt the class but you can let the teacher know you’re aware that what she’s teaching you is not the truth. That’s the next level Dr. Woodson was hoping for; change from within. Now that we know we have a history its time to find out everything we can about that history. Why was our history stolen from us? And most importantly, who’s behind the theft? What Negroes were involved and put into place to help hide the truth? The information is out there. It still remains a fact; we build our future by using bricks from our past. Taken from xavierjamesuncensored.blogspot.com

Jesus Against the Indians:Who Won That War?

By Xavier James




The Panare Indians (Native Americans) of the Colorado Valley had lived quiet, secluded lives for centuries. Until one day Christian missionaries came to visit them. They entered with open, loving arms in the name of Jesus and were given a respectful, friendly welcome. Unknown to the Panare, the missionaries’ intentions was to convert these "heathens" into good Christians. So, they began teaching them the bible; telling them how to get into heaven. Of course they had a hard time convincing these Natives of how sinful, and evil they were. The language barrier presented a major problem. But their primary obstacle was getting the natives to understand how Christianity functioned. There were no words in the Panare language for sin, guilt or redemption because these were a people with their own spiritual beliefs and customs that were in place centuries before the bible, Jesus Christ or Christianity ever existed.



But in order to instill a concept of redemption these Christian missionaries had to make the natives feel guilt and shame. But the Panare Tribe still wasn’t buying what these good Christians were selling. So, the missionaries decided to translate the New Testament into the Panare language. The Christian missionaries revised the New Testament, took Judas, Pontius Pilot and the Romans out and replaced them with the Panare. That's right; they gave them a bible that now said the Panare Indians killed Jesus Christ. It included statements like: "Let's kill Jesus Christ," said the Panare...."They laid a cross on the ground and nailed him to it....they raised him straight up, nailed....thus the Panare killed Jesus Christ!"



Then came God's wrath for killing his son. The revised bible said: "God will destroy the Panare. God will burn you all; burn all the animals, your children and burn also the earth. God will exterminate the Pinare by throwing them on the fire." The missionaries told the natives that they had to pay for what their ancestors had done and their only salvation was in serving them and the church. But God is good. 'Do you want to be roasted in the fire?' asks God. 'Do you have something to pay me with so that I won't roast you in the fire?' Demands God. One native lady yelled out "I don't want to burn in the big fire. I love Jesus." Hundreds of Panare indians abandoned their ancestors and took up Chritianity. That was in 1976 but these type of terror tactics were frequently employed to convert often hard to convince Natives. For years, it had been a common practice among Christian missionaries to accuse Indians (Natives) of killing Jesus Christ.



These are the exact same methods used against Africans and their children (black Americans) to this very day. Just like us, they were told the book they were given was God's word. It was not. They committed what King James and the Jewish Scribes had been doing to persons of African descent for centuries; spiritual terrorism. No one wants to burn in "the big fire" so we all converted.


"The role of a missionary is to infiltrate a tribe, and convince or coerce them into rejecting their own spiritual beliefs in favor of the Christian Church."



So, who won the war fought between Jesus and the Indians? Jesus! And to this day Natives and Blacks have never recovered. This is Christianity and these are the Christians.



From: xavierjamesuncensored.blogspot.com


Reference and suggested reading:
The Missionaries: God Against the Indians by Norman Lewis 1990

Super bowl Commercial Seriously Crossed the Line

By Xavier James


Although I wasn’t the only one who found the Doritos super bowl commercial disgusting and repugnant, I am one of the only people not afraid to talk about it. What’s the difference between Janet Jackson’s exposed breast and a man licking another man’s fingers and pants? Answer: One was live and the other was previously recorded. But my kids didn’t need to see either. Bad taste is bad taste. We as a society continue to digress to the point where capitalism is an anything goes environment controlled by special interests. Did someone really want to sell Doritos bad enough to think an advertisement that disgusting was funny?

Every time I see Doritos I’m going to think about that crazy looking White dude licking that Black guy’s finger. So, it’s unlikely I’ll be buying Doritos anytime soon. Of course advertisers are going to deny the ‘gay’ theme in the commercial. The overt homosexual reference was clear but so was its subliminal homosexual programming. That’s why the religious right is always up in arms and I can’t say that I blame them this time. If it was a woman in the commercial licking fingers and sniffing crotches it would have been left on the cutting room floor. But “guy on guy” action is okay, huh.

I personally don’t want to see a religious commercial during the super bowl no more then I want to see a homosexual advertisement. If homosexuals are indeed behind this awful marketing they should be aware that it caused more harm then good to their cause. The finger licking, crotch sniffer was weird, aggressive and antagonistic. And his unwelcome intrusion into our living rooms is what people are going to remember most. Taken from xavierjamesuncensored.blogspot.com

Women Should Pay a Fine For Having a Menstrual Cycle

By Xavier James



Hey, don’t get mad at me. I didn’t say it; God did. You can’t argue with God can you?
How do I know God said it? Because it’s in the Bible, stupid! In Leviticus 15:28 God basically says ‘after a woman’s menstrual cycle she must wait a week then bring him two turtle doves or two young pigeons as atonement for her menstrual Cycle.’ That’s a bit unusual, huh? Especially since God was the one who created them. He could have just left out the monthly cycle and women would have been able to save thousands of dollars on feminine care products in the course of a lifetime. Saved money = more tithes and offerings.

God may not have liked menstrual blood but he also wasn’t too fond of midgets (little people), God called them dwarfs, or people with a lazy eye or broken bones. He didn’t want them anywhere near him. I asked a local pastor what in the world was up with that.

He told me that the Old Testament didn’t count anymore and that the old laws were nailed to the cross when Jesus died. The pastor, however, didn’t answer my question at all. Why did God tell them not to come to church or come anywhere near his holy alter just because they were sick, short or had a heat rash? Why didn’t he just heal them?

“The Lord works in mysterious ways. We can’t question God,” he said.

“So God changed his mind after his son Jesus died on the cross and now everybody whether they got ring worn, or inherited skin diseases like psoriasis can come to church and praise God; even make an offering. Why wasn’t I good enough for God when I was sick, I asked?

The preacher became visibly annoyed. But I still wanted to know what made God change his mind.

“Well in Leviticus 21:16,” I continued, “God said his rules were to last for all future generations.” God also said ‘I am the same today, yesterday and always.’ “Which meant ‘I ain’t changing my mind, so don’t keep on asking  me.” Then He changed his mind. Why would God back peddle? And if the Old Testament no longer counts doesn’t that include the Ten Commandments?” I asked, a bit more confident now.

“No, you still must keep his commandments.”
“But you just said the Old Testament was nailed to….”
“Look!” he cut me short. “I have to make a phone call.”

I started to ask him if he was going call God because he sure as hell wasn’t answering any my questions. “One more question,pastor. Is the Old Testament God the same as the New Testament God?”

“Of course,” he grinned at being able to emphatically answer a question.

“Well somebody gave God a makeover. I mean, He completely did a 180 on all his rules and regulations. Maybe it was Jesus who talked some since into him.”

The preacher shook his head at my cynicism and walked away. He probably called me blasphemous. I didn’t care. A guy like that never would have made it back in Moses’ time, anyway; couldn’t answer a few simple questions. If the Old Testament doesn’t count why do they still use it and are always referencing it? Why would God create a woman in Genesis and find her or anybody else repugnant by the time they get to Leviticus? It just didn’t make any sense. It became apparent that someone’s been putting words in God’s mouth.

God, the Creator would not have created 'woman' then literally charge her for the way that he created her. It begs the question; who’s behind all the confusion and lies? Who’s benefitting from the fact that people believe non-sense over their own common sense? The short answer: Follow the money! And I guarantee you it leads straight to your pastor’s door. I realized why they changed the New Testament to include everybody. They didn’t want God to seem like too much of a bigot. He’d already made the Jews his chosen people; besides sick people, Gentiles and people who aren’t perfect spend money too. I wonder if today’s Jewish men are as afraid of menstrual blood as their ancestors? After all women are still having periods. But instead of taxing them, guess what God decided to do? He invented tampons.xavierjamesuncensored.blogspot.com