The new movie 'Son of God' is representative of Eurocentric thought and behavior.
That's why all you keep hearing white folks talk about is how "sexy" the guy playing Jesus is.
That's not unusual since Christians are the biggest freaks around. The words Jesus and sexy
shouldn't even be in the same sentence; it's a disrespect because you're dirtying it up.
The rest of the world actually does respect their religious symbols and take conversations
about them very seriously. And they're very protective of their images. But not white Americans.
Why is so much fuss being made over this so called "Sexy Jesus?" Well think about it; outside of
Hollywood most white men look like Andy Griffith, Barney Fife and Jack Black. But the real question is; how is it possible that in 2014 there's still no realistic portrayal of this mythical, Biblical character Jesus? Why not black Jesus? The Bible gives a good description of Jesus as having skin the color of sand (brown) and hair the texture of wool.
The Bible also gives clear geographical reference that makes it impossible for white
people to be descendants of that land. White people entered that land by means of invasion, However, they're always depicted as being native saviours and defenders. Similar to white folks today depicting themselves as Indians.
Unfortunately, black folks are going to spend they're hard earned money to see "sexy Jesus" and feel good about doing it. All it takes is for white folks to tell them it didn't matter what color Jesus was. Well, if it didn't matter, why not make him black? Because no one would pay to see that!